Independent RWA research desk · Status: operationalMethodology & corrections · Submit a story
BTC$84.4K+1.14% ETH$2.7K+1.73% DeFi TVL$95.5BMarket data DEX 24h$11.5BMarket data ETH gas1.81 gweiNetwork data 2026-09-29 13:20 UTC
Project Explainers · Compared 2026-09-29

RWA tokenization platforms compared: issuers, access models and networks

Tokenization is not one product. It covers at least four different businesses: tokenized cash-like instruments, tokenized fund shares, tokenized credit, and platform software that other issuers run on. Lumping them together is the most common analytical mistake in this category, so the first column below is deliberately the business model rather than the brand.

Who this is for: Readers building a map of who does what in tokenized assets, and sponsors who need to know which category they are actually buying into.

Short answer

Read the access model column before anything else. A permissioned product with a transfer-agent gate is a different instrument from an open token, and the two are routinely compared as if they were the same thing.

Some outbound links on this page may become partner links if a commercial agreement is signed. Partner status never changes which products are listed, the order of the table, or the notes underneath it. Sponsorship does not buy a place in a comparison. See the affiliate disclosure for details. Affiliate disclosure →

The comparison

7 options
Option Business modelFlagship productNetworksAccess modelHow the issuer earnsPrimary documents
Securitize Tokenization platform and transfer agentIssuance and administration infrastructure for tokenized funds, including a tokenized money market fundMultiple, including Ethereum-compatible networksPermissioned: investors are onboarded through the platformPlatform and administration feesFund pages and offering documents published by the issuer
Ondo Finance Issuer of tokenized cash-like instrumentsShort-term treasury exposure offered in different access tiersEthereum-compatible networks plus at least one high-throughput chainSplit: at least one product is permissioned and at least one is designed for broader distributionManagement fees on assets in the productsProduct pages, offering documents and on-chain contract references
Superstate Issuer of tokenized fund sharesShort-term government securities exposure represented as a tokenEthereum-compatible networksPermissionedManagement feesFund information and regulatory filings published by the issuer
Backed Finance Issuer of tokenized tracker certificatesTokenized exposure to listed equities and other reference assetsMore than one distributed to different distribution channelsRestricted by jurisdiction; the issuer publishes the eligible-investor framingIssuance and management feesIssuer documentation per product line
Centrifuge Decentralized protocol for tokenized creditOn-chain pools financing real-world receivables and similar assetsIts own chain plus Ethereum-compatible networksPool by pool; each pool defines its own investor requirementsProtocol and pool-level feesPublic pool dashboards and protocol documentation
Maple Finance On-chain lending to institutional borrowersManaged lending poolsEthereum-compatible networksPermissioned for lenders in some pools; pool dependentProtocol fees and pool management feesPool pages with terms and protocol documentation
OpenEden Issuer of tokenized treasury exposureShort-term treasury product for eligible investorsEthereum-compatible networksPermissionedManagement feesProduct documentation from the issuer

A dash means the detail was not confirmable from public documentation at the review date. Treat every cell as a pointer to the primary document, not as a substitute for reading it.

Why each option is in the table

More in Project Explainers →

Securitize

Why it is here
Its role is infrastructure rather than a single token, which makes it the clearest example of how transfer-agent gating works in practice.

What to watch
Because the platform serves many issuers, a headline about 'Securitize' may refer to a different product than the one you were reading about. Trace the specific fund document.

Ondo Finance

Why it is here
The clearest illustration of the access-model split inside one brand: two products from the same issuer are not interchangeable for a given investor.

What to watch
Do not assume the transferability rules of one product apply to the other. Read the specific document for the token you are considering.

Superstate

Why it is here
A single-product, single-category issuer, which makes it easier to read the primary documents without disentangling a product family.

What to watch
Permissioned means the investor onboarding path, not the token contract, decides who can hold it. Confirm eligibility criteria directly.

Backed Finance

Why it is here
Extends tokenization past cash-like instruments into equity exposure, which is where the category gets materially more complex.

What to watch
Jurisdictional restrictions are the practical gate here, not the on-chain contract. A token being transferable does not make it offerable to you.

Centrifuge

Why it is here
The credit side of RWA, where the risk is borrower repayment rather than interest-rate movement, so it deserves a genuinely different reading method.

What to watch
Credit risk is per pool and not comparable across pools. A protocol dashboard is not an audit of any single borrower.

Maple Finance

Why it is here
A useful counterpoint to treasury-focused products: the return source is lending, so the analysis starts with who borrows and on what terms.

What to watch
Historical credit events in this category show that a pool can be affected by one borrower. Look for concentration, not just headline size.

OpenEden

Why it is here
Another single-category issuer in the treasury segment, useful for comparing fee structure and access rules across issuers.

What to watch
Category participation is crowded and products differ mainly in fees and gating. Compare those two columns across issuers before comparing anything else.

Common questions

What actually makes something an RWA?

A token that represents an off-chain claim or asset, where the value depends on something outside the blockchain: a security, a receivable, a commodity or a fund share. A token whose value comes only from on-chain activity is not an RWA, even if it is used in the same pools.

Does a permissioned token mean only institutions can use it?

Not necessarily. Permissioned means an onboarding step decides who is eligible, and the criteria can be jurisdictional, accreditation-based or simpler. What it always means is that the transfer restrictions are enforced at the token level, so the token can behave differently from an open one.

Why does the access model matter so much?

Because it determines what happens when you want out. An open token can be sold to anyone on a venue that lists it. A permissioned token may only be redeemable with the issuer or transferable to an approved holder, which changes the exit path entirely.

Method. Rows are built from issuer documentation, published fund pages and on-chain contract references. We do not provide investment advice, we do not project returns, and we do not treat an issuer's own marketing page as independent verification. Where a legal or regulatory status could not be confirmed from a primary document, the cell says so explicitly rather than repeating the claim.

Related research

All topics →

Tether’s USDT at center of Iran’s shadow banking network, new Senate Report says

Tether and its stablecoin have become central in "Iran's shadow banking system," according to a new Senate investigation.

Ondo Perps adds spot trading for 12 tokenized stocks and ETFs

Ondo Perps' integration of spot trading and perpetual futures on one platform enhances trading efficiency but raises regulatory and risk concerns.

Bitmine surpasses 6 million ETH holdings, worth $16 billion

Bitmine's massive ETH holdings could amplify market volatility, linking its stock performance closely with Ethereum's price fluctuations.

Bybit accepts Franklin Templeton tokenized funds as trading collateral

Eligible institutions can pledge Benji-issued fund shares for stablecoin credit lines while keeping the underlying assets in off-exchange custody.

Crypto-friendly institution Franklin Templeton brings its tokenized collateral service to Bybit

Franklin Templeton’s tokenized money market shares can be used as collateral for USDT or USDC trading credit lines on Bybit while earning yield on the underlying assets.

Wall Street Giant Warns AI Agents Could Trigger a New Kind of Bank Run

Apollo warns AI agents like Meta's Muse could move cash from 0.1% bank accounts into 5% yields. Here's what it means for you. The post Wall Street Giant Warns AI Agents Could Trigger a New Kind of Bank Run appeared first

Sponsor this page

Put your platform next to this shortlist.

Sponsored placements are labeled and never change the table, the order, or the verification notes. Send the product, the destination and the placement you want.

View advertising options →